« City's Low Density Means Buses are Better Form of Transit | Main | Can rubberized asphalt bring peace and quiet to SR 520? »
Comments
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Recent Posts
- Walter Scott Prevails on the Use of Quiet Pavement
- Minnesota Spends $1 Billion a Year for Neglible Light Rail Congestion Relief
- Minnesota Funds Frivolous Projects Rather Than Bridge Repairs, Wall Street Journal reports
- Medina Delighted with Quiet Pavement (Rubberized Asphalt)
- Can rubberized asphalt bring peace and quiet to SR 520?
- Big Brother and Toll Transponders: Records of your Driving to be Retained (and Available) for 8 Years
- City's Low Density Means Buses are Better Form of Transit
- Group Forms to Fight Light Rail
- RTID DOA? KING 5 Poll Reinforces the Deathwatch Notion
- Congestion is The Problem!
The DOT FAQ specifically states that "travel data will be used to monitor the performance of the pilot project, but this data will not be linked to account data."
In other words, there will be no link between the data recording when (and where) you travelled, and YOU.
Big Brother indeed. Blind big brother, perhaps.
Posted by: Carless in Seattle | June 18, 2007 at 07:59 AM